Posted by Dr. Bob on January 21, 2007, at 2:21:19
In reply to Re: please do not post to me rules, posted by Deneb on January 20, 2007, at 16:18:07
> It would seem to me that if you make a blanket statement that you don't intend to enforce PDNP's except in situations where you deem it necessary, and in any given situation you deem it necessary, it would seem only fair to warn the requestee of that *before* you start handing out Admin actions.
>
> DinahThanks, I think I see what you mean, if A asks B not to post to them, then B should know whether that's going to be enforced or not. Well, I guess they both should know...
The new procedure includes an administrative reply if the request is going to be enforced. Let's make it official:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061228/msgs/724686.html
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#harassed--
> what's there to stop people from altering the chat dialogue?
>
> Deneb*There's now a "fingerprint", as Dinah mentioned:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061228/msgs/723574.html
Like with babblemail.
Bob
poster:Dr. Bob
thread:723564
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061228/msgs/724687.html