Posted by Lou Pilder on January 6, 2007, at 15:08:53
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to Jeff Smith » Lou Pilder, posted by JeffSmith on January 6, 2007, at 14:24:55
>
> > Jeff,
> > You wrote,[...Lou..I understand what you..said...the use of * does not change >the.meaning/definition of any word in any way as far as I can comprehend...]. You wrote,[...in >order to believe that one form of the word is offensive and the other is not (you would) have >to:...]
> > I appreciate your well-thought-out list here including the {some other reason(s)}.
>
> -Im glad you do, and thank you for saying it was well thought out.
>
> > You wrote,[...I don't believe deluding oneself into believing something is at all a >sound/healthy mental health practice...and fantasies...sounds like..deluding...]
> > Thank you for your reply. Lou's thirteenth smiley>>[:-)
>
> -Youre welcome... and why the smiley count (if I may ask)? Did my reply inspire #13 and if so I must be very special, right? (If not Ill still choose to believe so, so dont ruin my delusion please by saying otherwise).
>
> > You wrote,[...do you mean ..{me}...?]
> > I posted to the forum as {friends} and meant that anyone could email me. But this post is my >reply to you although anyone can respond or email.
> > I would like for anyone to use the following link and click on {d} to see the psychiatric >definitions for delusion and denial.
> > Lou
> > http://www.abess.com/glossary.html
>
> -I see.
> And I clicked your link, read the def. for delusion only to discover that this part is often me:
> "The belief is not one ordinarily accepted by other members of the person's culture or subculture.."
> Great, so now I really am delusional on top of everything else. : (
>
>
Jeff,
You wrote,[...The beliefe is not one ordinarilly accepted...so now I am really delusional..]
Do you not think that the grammatical structure of the definition was {rulling out} that case?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:717797
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061228/msgs/719884.html