Re: The No Offensive Language Rule » JeffSmith

Posted by Emme on December 31, 2006, at 10:34:55 [reposted on December 31, 2006, at 11:08:24 | original URL]

In reply to The No Offensive Language Rule, posted by JeffSmith on December 31, 2006, at 9:49:56

> It really seems completely illogical, unless Im just missing the logical point entirely?
> Any thoughts on this matter?
Subst1tut1ng symb01s S33ms 1ll0g1c@l t0 m3 @ls0. W3 c@n @all r3@d b3tw33n th3 *s. But 1 @ssum3 1t must m@k3 @ d1ff3r3nc3 t0 s0m3 f01ks @nd 1 s33 1t @s a m1n0r 1ssu3. 1 h0p3 th1s p0st 1s c1v1l.
emme
P.S. h1nt: 3 = e.

Thread

The No Offensive Language Rule JeffSmith 12/31/06
we'd like to opine but our thoughts aren't civil (nm) » JeffSmith zenhussy 12/31/06
Re: The No Offensive Language Rule » JeffSmith Emme 12/31/06
Re: The No Offensive Language Rule » Emme jylisnotlaughing 12/31/06
Re: The No Offensive Language Rule JeffSmith 12/31/06
Re: The No Offensive Language Rule rayww 12/31/06
Re: The No Offensive Language Rule » jylisnotlaughing Emme 12/31/06
Re: The No Offensive Language Rule » Emme JeffSmith 12/31/06
Re: The No Offensive Language Rule jylisnotlaughing 12/31/06
Ah, I see :) (nm) » jylisnotlaughing Emme 12/31/06
Re: The No Offensive Language Rule Dr. Bob 12/31/06
Re: The No Offensive Language Rule » Dr. Bob muffled 12/31/06
Re: The No Offensive Language Rule » Dr. Bob Emme 12/31/06
Re: The No Offensive Language Rule » Dr. Bob sunnydays 12/31/06
Re: The No Offensive Language Rule JeffSmith 1/1/07
...
Re: The No Offensive Language Rule » Dr. Bob Llurpsie_Noodle 1/13/07

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Emme thread:717797
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061228/msgs/717799.html

	for
in