Posted by Lou Pilder on December 26, 2006, at 7:26:20
DR. Hsiung,
I am requesting that you clarify what you mean in your reply to me;
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/715974.html
[...Sorry, but I don't think I have anything else to add at this time...] to my request for clarification in the post;
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/713673.html
In post 713673, I had requested that you clarify your statement to me;[...the question for me hasn't been whether they're discriminatory, but whether it's {more helpful} to focus on the past or on the present...].
Your statement arrises out of my concern that there are posts here that one can read presently that have statements IMO that have been used for centuries by those that want to arrouse antisemitic feelings in a community as in historical state-sponsored antisemitism.
It is my deep conviction that it could be good for the community as a whole for the administration here to take affirmative action now and notate those statements as being uncivil here to show that the forum repudiates all forms of antisemitism. For if one match can start a forest fire, could not one statement that has the potential IMO to arrouse antisemitic feelings, that is left unsanctioned here, have the potential for some others to think that the match has kindled a fire and that the fire is still burning?
Using this as an introduction to this, it is your reply to me that I am asking clarification for so that I could have a better understanding of what you mean by it. At this time, I am unsure as to what you mean by the nature of the grammatical structure of your reply to me.
The next post by me will address my concerns for you to clarify as to the grammatical structure and what you mean in your reply;
[...Sorry, but I don't think I have anything else to add at this time...]
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:716428
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/716428.html