Posted by Lou Pilder on December 15, 2006, at 11:43:51
In reply to Re: Lou's request, posted by Dr. Bob on December 14, 2006, at 23:04:50
> > D. Have you rescinded your statement here that says that one match can start a forest fire?
>
> No. But I do think that in general, fresh matches pose more of a risk than used ones.
>
> Bob
Friends,
It is written here as a response from a meber to Dr. Hsiung's statement to me about fresh matches pose more of a risk than used ones,[...Oh so true...].
My friends, do not fires linger way beyond the time that the match goes out? Could not the fires of hate still be burning because the original fire ,even though it went out, rekindled in another place from the sparks that were carried by the winds because the original fire was allowed to burn and not put out when it was seen innitially?
The winds that carried antisemitism that was not stopped in Europe untill 1947 culminated in the murder of millions of people, 1 1/2 million of them Jewish children whose crime to be snetenced to death according to their murderers, was that they perhaps had a sister of their mother be a Jew.
Are there not fires still burning today? If so, I think that we could all be hurt by these fires and that they have the potential IMO to affect all of us. Were there people that were silent in Europe before 1947? Were there consequences to their silence? Have you not read what the great British/Irish philosopher,Edmund Burke said? He said,[...All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing...]
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:713673
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/713928.html