Posted by Lou Pilder on December 11, 2006, at 8:13:55
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to Honore » Lou Pilder, posted by 10derHeart on December 10, 2006, at 22:18:23
10der,
You wrote,[...send him the link..the sooner..he..get to it, right?..he's told you..issue..only a suggestion...].
But did you not think that his asking me to send it to someone else first was in some way reasoned to be concerning the saving of his time? If that is what you thought that his reasoning was to not accept the post on September around the 13th without asking me to ask someone else first before I send it to him, then could we look at how credible that could be?I ask;
A. Was there more time spent asking me to ask someone else first than if he would have accepted the post on the 13th?
B. If I can send it to him now, on the 11th of December, what, in your opinion, could be why it could be that I was told to send it to someone else first on around the 13th of September to save time?
C. How credible, in your opinon, is the opinion that he wanted to save time as a reason for him to ask me to ask someone else first before I send it to him? (Lou's note>Dr. Hsiung did not give that, as far as I know, as a reason to ask me to send it to someone else first before I send it to him).
D. In your opinion, if the post in question that I would like to send beforehand involves showing state-sponsored antisemitism,and that has been told to me will not be permitted here, what in your opinion is why that is different from someone posting here content that shows state-sponsored racism?
As far as sending it to him now, I am awaiting his reply to me concerning what the difference is that content in a post here that shows state-sponsored racism is permitted, but showing content that shows state-sponsored antisemitism is not.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:712011
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/712528.html