Posted by zazenduckie on December 3, 2006, at 16:09:36
In reply to Re: Generic use of badge of shame » zazenduckie, posted by SLS on December 3, 2006, at 12:52:43
> > > As I performed a search on Google, it appears that the term "badge of shame" has, in common practice, come to be used generically.
>
> > There is a similiar controversey with animal rights groups using the term "holocaust" for the plight of endangered animals. I think some terms should not be allowed to become generic and acceptable.
>
> Did the word "holocaust" exist prior to the 1930s?
HOLOCAUST
Definition from the Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, volume 2 from Macmillan Publishing
HOLOCAUST (Heb., sho'ah). The word "holocaust" is derived from the Greek holokauston, which originally meant a sacrifice totally burned by fire; it was used in the translation of I Samuel 7:9, "a burnt offering to God." In the course of time it came to be used to describe slaughter on a general or large scale, and, especially, various forms of the destruction of masses of human beings. In the 1950s the term came to be applied primarily to the destruction of the Jews of Europe under the Nazi regime, and it is also employed in describing the annihilation of other groups of people in World War II. The mass extermination of Jews has become the archetype of GENOCIDE, and the terms sho'ah and "holocaust" have become linked to the attempt by the Nazi German state to destroy European Jewry during World War II.
The use of the Hebrew word sho'ah to denote the destruction of Jews in Europe during the war appeared for the first time in the booklet Sho'at Yehudei Polin (The Holocaust of the Jews of Poland), published by the United Aid Committee for the Jews of Poland, in Jerusalem in 1940. The booklet contains reports and articles on the persecution of Jews in eastern Europe from the beginning of the war, written or verbally reported by eyewitnesses, among them several leaders of Polish Jewry. Up to the spring of 1942, however, the term was rarely used. The Hebrew term that was first used, spontaneously, was hurban (lit., "destruction"), similar in meaning to "catastrophe," with its historical Jewish meaning deriving from the destruction of the Temple. It was only when leaders of the Zionist movement and writers and thinkers in Palestine began to express themselves on the destruction of European Jewry that the Hebrew term sho'ah became widely used. It was still far from being in general use, even after the November 1942 declaration of the Jewish Agency that a sho'ah was taking place. One of the first to use the term in the historical perspective was the Jerusalem historian BenZion Dinur (Dinaburg), who, in the spring of 1942, stated that the Holocaust was a "catastrophe" that symbolized the unique situation of the Jewish people among the nations of the world.
King James Bible: I Samuel 7:0 7:9 And Samuel took a sucking lamb, and offered [it for] a burnt offering wholly unto the LORD: and Samuel cried unto the LORD for Israel; and the LORD heard him.
Definition from Yad VaShem web site:
> > In the same way I am sensitive to people's wish not to be embarassed. But I suggest that a caution about someone's advice on an internet forum is in no way comparable to a "badge of shame". And to use the term generically is not something I would find to be a positive thing.
>
> In my ignorance, I would never have given the term a second thought. I did not recognize it as being associated with a particular group of people. I am still conflicted over its use. It is an effective term for which the use of the historic allusion might be appropriate.Scott I wouldn't have either at one time. Lou has made me a lot more sensitive to things like that.
Frankly when I first saw the phrase used here I was uneasy. I thought of the Yellow Star of David badges the Jews were forced to wear in the Nazi era. And that apparently wasn't even the origin of the phrase although it seems to echo what went before. I think some words have so much history that even if some one is not totally conscious of that history there is a sort of second message they carry with them-if that makes any sense.>
> - Scott
poster:zazenduckie
thread:706108
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/710002.html