Posted by Lou Pilder on November 16, 2006, at 7:00:59
In reply to Re: Lou's request, posted by Dr. Bob on November 16, 2006, at 2:31:25
DR. Hsiung,
In my question to you as to if you enter a thread as a discussant and not sanction a statement in question, I asked if that could mean that you are {supporting} what the statement purports. Your reply was that if you do enter a thread and do not sanction the statement in question, then you have read it and probably think that it is OK,[...{but that does not mean that you >agree< with it...]}.
I ask;
A. Does this mean that you consider the statement in question to be {civil}, for >agreement or disagrement< as to what the statements purports is not a criteria for determining if a statement is civil or not?
B. Does this mean that you have not determined then if the statement is civil or not?
C. Does this mean that you could leave an uncivil statement {unsanctioned and also |not reply directly| to the member reporting the statement in question}, even though a member has used the {report feature} to ask if you consider the statement civil or not?
D.something else
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:704112
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/704195.html