Posted by Lou Pilder on October 8, 2006, at 11:20:29
DR. Hsiung,
In accordance with your reminder procedure, the following;
I would also like for you to consider the following if you are going to post a reply to me in this thread.
You have in your FAQ that there are exceptions to rules and you have given them for your [...3 consecutive post...] rule.
Now the exceptions indicate that there could be the exception made due to {a >need< to post [without waiting] for another to post after 3 posts}.
I ask,: If that is the case,could {my need} to teach, by breaking down into individual parts that may take 7 consecutive posts before one can see what I can uncover, that there are statements here that have the potential IMO to foster defamation toward Jews and me as a Jew that are being let to stand, without repudiation, be just as supportive as the need that others have to post what they think that they need to post and thearfore I could also post without waiting?
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060918/msgs/692051.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:692964
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060918/msgs/692964.html