Posted by SLS on September 23, 2006, at 16:14:19
In reply to Re: A decision to reconsider » SLS, posted by Dinah on September 23, 2006, at 9:39:43
> I'm not saying it's so because I don't know what's in Dr. Bob's mind, but perhaps he considers medication without a prescription a different case than incivility. And perhaps he has a list of unacceptable sites based on that?
>
> Just a guess, since I doubt Dr. Bob has the time to go through levels of links in his brief pass over the board.
I would be more than dismayed if all citations from the [xxx] domain were to be eliminated. [xxx] is an valuable resource. The abstracts themselves make no mention of procurement of drugs. They have at the bottom of their pages a link to one main page or another that then contain a link to a page with links to online pharmacies. So, then, the posts with links to abstracts would link to online pharmacies through 4 levels. I should hope that would be deep enough to pass a determination of acceptability.I would understand fully if Dr. Bob were to codify a rule that would determine that a link appearing on a webpage linked to in a post must contain civil material. In other words, civility will extend 2 levels. I am just responding to his most recent comments about links made on Administration and relating it to a recent action he took on the main board regarding same which was inconsistent with those comments.
I would protest vehemently should [xxx] abstracts be determined unacceptable to link to.
- Scott
poster:SLS
thread:688109
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060918/msgs/688470.html