Posted by Lou Pilder on August 16, 2006, at 16:40:53
In reply to Re:Glydin's response to aspects of Lou's post, posted by SLS on August 16, 2006, at 16:12:24
Friends,
It is written that unlimited consecutive posting is disruptive...distracts...]
I have examined this argument and find that consecutive posts result from others not posting, not that the poster, including myself, posted consecutive posts by telling others that they can not post.
Members of this forum can post at any time in a thread. As far as the unlimited aspect, I agree that if no one ever posted in the thread, that could happen. But Dinah has said that she will post in my threads.
And then there is the aspect that people do not have to read my posts. With 1000s of posters here and many boards, could those that do not want to participate in a thread that has more than 3 consecutive posts go elseware?
But let us look at this situation from my perspective.
First, it is a fact that the content of the threads of mine have not been the subject. Nor has there ever been an alligation that the content was not supportive in its end result. In fact, many have appreciated the content of those threads.
Today, I received an email from someone that said they found me on Psycho Babble. They said that I could save their life and that they now want to Overcome the addiction from BZDs that they are in. They said that my posts were the encouragement that gave them the spark to overcome. I ask, is it a higher priority here that support be placed under as to if more than 3 consecutive posts can be seen?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:677021
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060802/msgs/677164.html