Posted by Lou Pilder on August 13, 2006, at 10:36:17
Friends,
Please note that in my requests for a determination, I do not consider that a request is an {objection}, although Dr. Hsiung may, to what is requested to be determined as to the accepatbility or not in relation the guidlines of the forum. My requests, to me, are for me to have more definition and clarification about the rules so that more definition could be given to support, for I can not read the mind of the rule-maker,and IMO requesting definition as to if the statement in question is acceptable or not does not mean that it is a complaint, for the request is to see what the maker of the rule considers to be acceptable or not {in relation to his guidlines of his rules for the forum}. I can not know his or anyone else's mind without asking.
As to what he says is or is not acceptable, is what I am asking for, and it is my deep conviction that one should not be sanctioned for {not knowing} if the rule maker considers something acceptable or not about his rules.
Now the new rule ,as I see it, has not been put into the FAQ yet? If it becomes a rule, or has already been put in the FAQ, then it is concievable that posts that have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings, or be defaming to me, could be left on the board indefiniatly without my request for Dr. Hsiung to determine if the statement is acceptable or not, ever being seen on the forum to the members, am I right? This is because I can not, according to the new rule, email my concern as a request to him to see if the statement in question, in his thinking, has the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings if the poster is one that I have made 3 requests to Dr. Hsiung in the past.
So concievably, {those posters} could post what could be seen to have the potential to accuse Jews and defame Jews without me being able to email Dr. Hsiung about it, because I have already used up my 3 requests according to the new rule. And looking at the new rule, is there anything given to continue to receive an answer to your request after the last opportunity which is to post a request to look at his email afte ,I guess, 5 days or so have already run and the statement has stood for that long without a reply?
I do not feel confortable with that kind of rule, for I do not think that it is supportive or civil to let stand for one minuet, yet 5 days or more any statements that could foster defamation toward Jews and me as a Jew on this forum.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:676011
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060802/msgs/676011.html