Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: objection rules » Jost

Posted by Dinah on August 9, 2006, at 19:53:50

In reply to Re: objection rules, posted by Jost on August 9, 2006, at 16:54:16

I actually agree.

I see the purpose for it on the board, but I don't really see it in emails.

I agree that at some point there should be limits, but three per person no matter what the time frame doesn't seem to be the best use of limits. And the burden of counting the requests from/to might be greater than the burden of receiving a few more emails.

Maybe the limits should be defined in another way? And perhaps after the rule of email only requests has been in place for a while, and areas of concern have been identified?

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Dinah thread:407882
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060802/msgs/675274.html