Re: B.T.W » Gabbi~G

Posted by Larry Hoover on June 1, 2006, at 17:07:23

In reply to B.T.W, posted by Gabbi~G on June 1, 2006, at 15:07:17

> The implication here that someone's statement is flawed and it would be better all around if things were phrased using specific techniques, is a judgement.
>
> And it's no different than Estella's.
As I have been arguing. Thank you for being more concise and better said.
Lar

Thread

Re: blocked for 4 weeks teejay 5/21/06
...
Re: I-statements » Dinah Larry Hoover 6/1/06
Re: Clarification Larry Hoover 6/1/06
Further Clarification Larry Hoover 6/1/06
Re: I-statements » Larry Hoover gardenergirl 6/1/06
Re: I-statements » gardenergirl Larry Hoover 6/1/06
Offensive statements curtm 6/1/06
Re: I-statements » gardenergirl Tabitha 6/1/06
Re: Offensive statements llrrrpp 6/1/06
Re: I-statements Gabbi~G 6/1/06
B.T.W Gabbi~G 6/1/06
Please rephrase this Dr. Bob curtm 6/1/06
Re: I-statements » Gabbi~G Larry Hoover 6/1/06
Re: B.T.W » Gabbi~G Larry Hoover 6/1/06
Re: B.T.W Dinah 6/1/06
Re: Offensive statements Larry Hoover 6/1/06
Re: I-statements » Gabbi~G Dinah 6/1/06
Oh, and... Dinah 6/1/06
Re: I-statements » Dinah Larry Hoover 6/1/06
Re: Oh, and... Dinah 6/1/06
Re: I-statements » Larry Hoover Dinah 6/1/06
Re: Oh, and... » Dinah Larry Hoover 6/1/06
Re: Christianity? Larry Hoover 6/1/06
Re: B.T.W » Dinah Gabbi~G 6/1/06
Re: Estella's block for 4 weeks Deneb 6/1/06
I don't have anything against fast food btw Deneb 6/1/06
...
Re: thanks (nm) » muffled Dr. Bob 6/25/06

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Larry Hoover thread:646675
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060525/msgs/651588.html