Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Jakeman » Jakeman

Posted by Dinah on April 4, 2006, at 22:53:35

In reply to Re: Jakeman » wildcard11, posted by Jakeman on April 4, 2006, at 21:34:52

Why?

You can always point out facts. And allow people to reach their own conclusions. You don't need to label anything negatively to point out facts.

If you said, "The police are looking into the disappearance of $50,000 from XYZ Corp. Fred was in charge of the funds and Fred recently fled the country" wouldn't that be pointing out corruption? Would it be necessary to say that Fred is a lying cowardly thief?

Of course, it would be best if there was substantial evidence for the facts. I mean, if Allan just made up the story about Fred, that would be different. Or if Allan just heard about the story from his second cousin's plumber, perhaps he should put "I heard from my second cousin's plumber that..."

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Dinah thread:628449
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060317/msgs/629005.html