Posted by 838 on March 6, 2006, at 17:18:59
In reply to Re: critiques, posted by Dr. Bob on March 6, 2006, at 14:55:08
> How about constructive criticism? It tends to be more constructive if you put things in terms of how a policy might be improved rather than what's "wrong" with it...
If you don't think there is anything 'wrong' with it then why would you be motivated to look to improve it?
There is a reason why phil papers typically start with getting people to think about problems with the current view.
If it ain't broke... Why bother trying to figure out how to fix it?
poster:838
thread:615250
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060225/msgs/616756.html