Posted by pseudoname on December 5, 2005, at 13:31:20
In reply to Re: Wikipedia's Babble entry, posted by Dr. Bob on December 5, 2005, at 10:34:06
> It would be interesting, if Babble qualified for an entry.
Wiki frowns on gratuitous, "personal" articles. I think if we open with a statistics-dependent, brief, well-written, WikiStyle, neutral PoV article showing PB's reach & depth PLUS some supporting arguments in the adjoining ":talk" page, maybe mentioning some of our "official" connections, we won't be deleted.
> Would someone like to start?
I'm willing to give it a start, but I wanted to air the idea here first.
For the article name? There are too many other URLs containing "psychobabble" to just use "Psycho-Babble_(Website)". Other choices:
•Psycho-Babble_(support_site)
•Psycho-Babble_(e-community)
•Psycho-Babble_(discussion_site)
•Psycho-Babble_(consumer_site)
•Psycho-Babble_(consumer_info)
•Psycho-Babble_(forum)
•Psycho-Babble_by_Dr._BobThe last, though a little clumsy, is completely unique — but might seem like "personal gratification" to the Wiki police. And the other names would be more descriptive in Wiki's cross-references & disambiguation pages.
If anyone has other ideas on naming, please post here today. Tomorrow, if no one makes a convincing contrary argument (or beats me to it), I'll start an article named
•Psycho-Babble_(support_site)Wiki's current "Psycho-Babble" article will have to be re-named "Psycho-Babble_(speech)".
poster:pseudoname
thread:584230
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20051205/msgs/585736.html