Posted by SLS on July 15, 2005, at 8:33:15
In reply to Re: A suggestion from Dinah, acting as poster » SLS, posted by Dinah on July 15, 2005, at 8:01:45
Thanks for replying, Dinah.
> Dr. Bob's response on more than one occasion is to say that if you know you aren't an antisemite, you shouldn't be upset by that.
LOL
Say it ain't so, Dr. Bob, say it ain't so...
Do you think it rises to the level of defamation?
I still have to read a few posts to form an opinion, although I'm not yet sure how important it is to me yet to do so.
> I find that stance to be inconsistent with other civility rulings on his part.
I wish I had read all the stuff that has led to such a determination by Dr. Bob. I might be opening up myself for ridicule by many people here, but I rarely find Dr. Bob's determinations to be inconsistent with his civil guidelines or prejudicial to any one individual. I also see that the guidelines and their enforcement work to maintain order and civility here. Would a completely different protocol for the moderation of this site work to accomlish the same objective? Probably, but I haven't set out to synthesize one.
I could suggest something that would really throw a monkey-wrench into the works. However, it might not be civil to do so. So, I will anyway. :-)
Someone could reply to a post that upsets them by following that post with one that has in its subject line "Possible trigger" and just submit it with no message. LOL. Take THAT Dr. Bob. Hee hee. :-)
Hmm.
- Scott
poster:SLS
thread:527754
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050628/msgs/527951.html