Posted by gabbii on July 10, 2005, at 23:30:34
In reply to Re: Dr. Bob: Revise your DNP written rules in the FAQ, posted by alexandra_k on July 10, 2005, at 19:46:23
> They aren't directed.
> It was hard because Gabbi also had a tendency to say
> 'do not post to me'
> 'I take it back'
> 'do not post to me'
> 'I take it back'
>actually I said that twice. One time on two distinctly separate occasions months apart.
The first time I realized I had been rash and took back the D.N.P almost immediately.
That was clear.
The second time may have been a bit confusing because I did respond to an apology, and that was taken (as is according to the rules) to be an okay to re-engage.
So in my subsequent post I was reaffirming my D.N.P not changing my mind again. And I did say that "I would like to maintain the D.N.P request" Not that I had decided again to invoke a D.N.P request.
There was no "tendency"
My only mistake was not being able to ignore an apology, and feeling I needed to further explain my reasoning. Now that is being used as the example of my "Tendency to go back and forth."Now if you are really interested (sarcasm)
It is in the archives.
poster:gabbii
thread:525168
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050628/msgs/525998.html