Posted by chemist on June 18, 2005, at 2:00:41
In reply to Re: reconsideration, posted by Dr. Bob on June 18, 2005, at 0:36:34
> > Have you had a chance to consider this request, which is supported by a number of posters? I think it would do a lot for morale if the request was considered and addressed.
> >
> > TamaraJ
>
> First, I think it's great that Larry's receiving a lot of support. And I agree, it would be great to have him back. I've considered this request. But I don't think I should unblock people just because they're popular.
>
> --
>
> > Lately several posters have stated that they are fed up and leaving. Let's keep a good thing going.
> >
> > Jake
>
> I'm going to try. And I hope others do, too. Even if they feel fed up sometimes.
>
> Bobhello there, chemist here...far be it from me to wax administrative in re: good graces for blocked posters...yet - as noted by (at least) Dinah - Larry Hoover possesses an encyclopaedic knowledge of things germane to those who frequent the PB, Alternative, and Substance Use boards (i target these three because the posts are, in my estimation, mainly the sort requiring a factual answer about a compound)...
having been the subject of one - and, curiously (to me), only one ``do not post to me'' request - i am in the dark about the whole business, inclusive of whether LH comprehends the vagaries of the rules pertaining to the procedure: i go straight to jail without collecting $200 and/or passing ``go'' every time and the ``DNP'' to-and-fro is not invoked. easier for all parties, methinks...
enough about all that, myself, and rules: can LH and Dr. RH - perhaps in consult with TE (?) - expedite a speedier return than 1 august? if LH is perceived as popular, goody for him: blame the crowd and not the crooner. he dishes information few others can unearth and explain with clarity, is on the job around the clock, and has a dam named after him. i rest my case...
yours, tjm
poster:chemist
thread:511407
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050614/msgs/514766.html