Posted by Gabbi-x-2 on June 15, 2005, at 0:50:28
In reply to Re: DNP's and civility rules, posted by alexandra_k on June 14, 2005, at 23:53:27
>
> >I didn't try to check my understanding of your POV first...> Maybe I'm still missing something.
Alex, it was a post, a post directed to me, after I explicitly asked you not to. It's not half a post or a semi post.. it's a freaking post!
The number of "Yous" in it doesn't count, that one "You" was enough to set the tone of the entire post. That and the fact that it referred to my post and was directly after my post....
You really really believe anyone is going to think that was not breaking the rules.
Oh, of course it must be the "one *you* rule"
If the post by the recipient of a Do Not Post request replies to said post, and refers directly to it, but uses no more than one "you"
it is not a violation of the Do Not Post request.This is bloody unbelievable!
We Worked what out?
I repeated my do not post request after that.
And About Larry, I didn't say you were talking about why he did it. However your post of "support" Gee I'm sorry Lar but what did you expect, you did post to Emmy after she asked you not to" (inference, it's cut and dried Lar) Or your comment "What did he expect he broke the rules" would leave anyone wanting to explain that it isn't always that clear and he can't, he's blocked! It's simple, common, decency to leave him alone. In the same thread you have the gall to try and find reasons why your doing the EXACT same thing doesn't count. Oh wait but there is a difference -- this is not the first time you've done this kind of thing, and for Larry it is.I'm floored that you'd say you feel the need to teach others about consistancy and logic.
I can't think of anything bad enough to call this.
Insert DNP here.
poster:Gabbi-x-2
thread:511407
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050614/msgs/512971.html