Posted by Lou Pilder on May 16, 2005, at 22:02:35
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to Phillipa-3B » Lou Pilder, posted by Phillipa on May 16, 2005, at 21:45:19
Phillipa,
You wrote,[...I think it is a good idea....You may be on...hope you didn't take anything ...personally (No, I did not),...how would they know...?].
I think you have brought up a good question as to how one could be knowlegable about all boards.
I think that there is a common thread that determines acceptability or not on all the boards and then there could be particular distinctions for each board so that a member of the appeals board could be knowledgeable for any board, in a general sense, and then if the statement in question for determination is of the other type, then it could go to only those in the appeal board that are knowledgable about that. This could mean that only , say, 3 of the members of the appeals board could determine if Dr. Hsiung be reversed, or it could go back to Dr. Hsiung for further consideration and advisement.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:493677
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050417/msgs/498743.html