Posted by alexandra_k on March 26, 2005, at 18:00:19
In reply to Lou's response to alexandra_k's post-dpndon@2, posted by Lou Pilder on March 26, 2005, at 16:07:57
Ok. So firstly do we agree that because the poster didn't post the whole song what the whole song says is irrelevant to whether their post was acceptable to the guidelines of this forum etc???
I think we do agree on that, but maybe I am wrong there...
> Let us look at what the song says {if you agree that it depends on what the song says}.
But yeah, I see how you are interested in that because of your rider stuff...
> The song says,[...nothing but the blood of Jesus...} Now I ddid not put in {can wash...{my} sins...] because I only want to present what the song says.
Yeah. I get you.
> As to what the Rider said, let us use the following:
> The Rider said to me,"You shall not commit adultery.".
> Now in both cases, what is said is said to the person. The poster of the song does not say that nothing but the blood of Jesus will ...{others}sins. The Rider said {to me} that {I} shall not commit adultery, not others.
> Now if someone wants to have a faith that allows one to commit adultery, the Rider did not say to others that they could not commit adultery, just to me. Could you clarify if there is something that could allow one to be acceptable here and not the other?IMO both would be fine.
I think that is a good paralell.
I can't see any reason why one would be acceptable and the other not.
poster:alexandra_k
thread:475144
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050323/msgs/475940.html