Posted by Lou Pilder on February 28, 2005, at 11:55:26
Dr. Hsiung,
I am requesting that you write a determination as to the acceptability or not in relation to the guidlines of the forum.
The poster writes as a response to what I wrote,[...philosphical discussions could be saved for threads started by someone who is not in crisis...].
I feel accused and put down when I read that. It is not my intention to initiate a philosophical discussion, but to enrichen the discussion by offering another possibility tothe discussion. There are many psychiatrists that consider discontinuing a drug when symptoms such as those described in the thread appear and some psychiatrist and even the drug companies that manufacture the drug include warnings to discontinue the drug under particular circumstances. The poster writes that Thorazine is available to him/her. Could that not mean that Thorizine may be taken by the poster at this time? And if so, could not it be at least a possibility that the taking of Thorizine could be considered in relation to its discontinuation? In this case, could there be the potential for one, IMO, to have the potential to think that the statement in question has the potential to be considered that the poster may not respect the point of view that I asked the forum to include in the discussion?.
The poster writes,[...saved for threads started by someone who is not in crisis...]. Does that statement have ,in your opinion, the potential for others to think that what other posters write in the thread is OK, but what I wrote is not OK here? If a person is in crisis, is there not something in the FAQ that writes for the one in crisis to seek help outside of the forum?
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20050111/msgs/464262.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:464419
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050219/msgs/464419.html