Lou's reply to NikkiT2-the argmnt-sqnce » NikkiT2

Posted by Lou Pilder on February 6, 2005, at 9:10:16

In reply to Re: Lou's reply to NikkiT2-the argmnt » Lou Pilder, posted by NikkiT2 on February 6, 2005, at 8:31:05

NIkkiT2,
You wrote,[...If c were to post 3 times to a, and then 3 to b, and then 3 more to a, and then more to c etc etc then they are breaking the rule as I understand it...]
Let's say that the rule is being broken by your understanding. Could you explaine what possible harm there could be because someone posted to these 2 people in the sequence that you have described?
Lou

Thread

Lou's request to DR. Hsiung-5consec Lou Pilder 2/4/05
...
Re: Lou's reply Dr. Bob 2/4/05
Lou's reply to gardenergirl-bkadfrth » gardenergirl Lou Pilder 2/5/05
Re: Lou's reply to gardenergirl-bkadfrth » Lou Pilder gardenergirl 2/5/05
Lou's reply to gardenergirl-atmptoexpln » gardenergirl Lou Pilder 2/5/05
Re: Lou's reply to gardenergirl-atmptoexpln » Lou Pilder gardenergirl 2/5/05
Re: Lou's reply to gardenergirl-atmptoexpln » Lou Pilder NikkiT2 2/5/05
Lou's reply to gardenergirl-sprtofrul » gardenergirl Lou Pilder 2/5/05
Lou's response toan aspect this discussion-2enuf? Lou Pilder 2/5/05
Re: Lou's response toan aspect this discussion-2enuf? » Lou Pilder NikkiT2 2/5/05
Re: Lou's reply to gardenergirl-sprtofrul » Lou Pilder gardenergirl 2/5/05
Lou's reply to NikkiT2-the argmnt » NikkiT2 Lou Pilder 2/6/05
Re: Lou's reply to NikkiT2-the argmnt » Lou Pilder NikkiT2 2/6/05
Lou's reply to NikkiT2-the argmnt-sqnce » NikkiT2 Lou Pilder 2/6/05
Re: Lou's reply to NikkiT2-the argmnt-sqnce » Lou Pilder NikkiT2 2/6/05

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Lou Pilder thread:453373
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050128/msgs/453931.html

	for
in