Posted by jerrympls on January 20, 2005, at 19:32:53 [reposted on January 20, 2005, at 23:37:31 | original URL]
In reply to Re: Blocking Policy, posted by ace on January 20, 2005, at 19:13:28
> Dr Bob,
> In respect, I think the issue of blocking must be modified. Ofcourse this is your site and we all know that. However, I believe a man of Chemist's credentials transcends the need to block him for 8 weeks. Although he did seem somewhat irate, we are all at some time.
>
> Is it possible we can have a modified version of the blocking procedure introduced? For instance, asking the person to whom the block pertains to, if he intended to put down the person, or asking the person who was deemed to be put down, if, he/she infact feels this way.
>
> It is known that Chemist has great input into psycho-babble, and it is a shame to see him go for a time. I hope he does not eventually get sick of being blocked, and like CamW, relinquishes all association with this site.
>
> I'm not being aggressive in any way, I just want to see the best for everyone concerned on this informative site.
>
> Thankyou,
>
> AceI also agree with Ace- Matt did not indicate any offense taken by Chemist's post. Many forums I visit have a link or button that allows the poster to "report post to administrator." Perhaps implementing something along that line would help with the blocking policy? Just an idea...
Thanks
Jerry
poster:jerrympls
thread:445000
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050116/msgs/445010.html