Posted by Lou Pilder on December 15, 2004, at 16:08:19
In reply to Lou's reply to Dr. Hsiung-, posted by Lou Pilder on December 15, 2004, at 14:44:56
Dr Hsiung,
Another aspect of this discussion is that you have already stated that if something is in an offered link, then it is linked to the text.
In relation to that, I had requested to you to remove your link to a writing on the faith board opening page by Jean Jacques Rousseau that IMO was defaming to christians and put them down. You agreed and wrote that it is linked to the text. Then you put it in the table of contents which requiered another click to see it. This also came up in a post in question here and allowed what was posted because two clicks wre needed to see the statement in question.
This brings up the fact that you have made a change to your own policy to the poster that offered a link that had his/her church's doctrins posted as to statements that IMO have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings including that one reading them could think that jews are being portreyed as[... filthy, loathsome and full of all manner of abominations,...] and that there is a statement that has the potential for one to think that it is saying that the jews killed Christ.
I believe that it is different to make a change to a rule and then apply the change after it is made to future posts, than to make the change when something is already posted so that it is not subject to the rule. You wrote that you [...were thinking...]. I am requesting that you consider my viewpoint as to if you are going to impliment this policy or not.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:429941
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041109/msgs/430003.html