Redirected: the rule

Posted by Dr. Bob on November 4, 2004, at 5:40:23

In reply to Re: Requests Regarding NikkiT2 » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on November 3, 2004, at 11:18:32

> This rule is being applied retroactively?
>
> gg
> If that is so, what are you suggesting that I do if a future post, that you have not addressed, and has in it a statement that I did read and consider to be either accusitive or sarcastic or defaming to me, or such other similar kinds of statements, directed at me by the poster?
>
> Lou Pilder
I replied to these up in the thread about the rule:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041027/msgs/411467.html
Bob

Thread

Dr Bob - re your above post NikkiT2 11/1/04
...
Re: documenting rules - Dr. Bob All Done 11/2/04
Lou's reply to SLS-flgpol » SLS Lou Pilder 11/2/04
Lou's response to All Done-faq » All Done Lou Pilder 11/2/04
Re: To add to the discussion: Question for Lou » fayeroe Lou Pilder 11/2/04
Re: emailing this guy » nikkit2 Dr. Bob 11/2/04
Re: To add to the discussion: Question for Lou fayeroe 11/2/04
Re: Lou's Requests Regarding NikkiT2 » Dr. Bob Mark H. 11/2/04
Re: Requests Regarding NikkiT2 » Lou Pilder Dr. Bob 11/2/04
Just to clarify new rule---retroactive? » Dr. Bob gardenergirl 11/3/04
Re: Just to clarify new rule---retroactive? » gardenergirl Dinah 11/3/04
Lou's reply to Dr. Hsiung-expfcto » Dr. Bob Lou Pilder 11/3/04
Re: Requests Regarding NikkiT2 » Dr. Bob Lou Pilder 11/3/04
Redirected: the rule Dr. Bob 11/4/04
Bringing this thread back to its point nikkit2 11/4/04
Re: Bringing this thread back to its point Dr. Bob 11/4/04
Re: Bringing this thread back to its point » Dr. Bob nikkit2 11/4/04
Re: Bringing this thread back to its point Dr. Bob 11/4/04

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Dr. Bob thread:410220
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041027/msgs/411468.html

	for
in