Re: requests not to be posted to

Posted by Dr. Bob on September 8, 2004, at 19:02:22

In reply to Re: requests not to be posted to » Dr. Bob, posted by Larry Hoover on September 8, 2004, at 8:58:36

> When you're not around, one-sided ad hominem content goes totally unchallenged.
1. It could be "challenged" by positive content.
2. Does it have to be challenged at all?
> At some point in time, I might cross the line myself. Not because I'm so inclined, but because I am human, and provocation does have a limit.
Might there be some way to raise the limit?
> The "do not post to me" guidelines ... do not permit civil posters the opportunity to restore order to the debate.
Maybe not, but that's not their purpose. And restoring order is easier said than done...
Bob

Thread

Re: please be civil » Dr. Bob Larry Hoover 9/7/04
Re: from what I recall » Larry Hoover Dinah 9/7/04
Re: from what I recall » Dinah Larry Hoover 9/7/04
Re: requests not to be posted to Dr. Bob 9/7/04
Re: requests not to be posted to » Dr. Bob Larry Hoover 9/8/04
Lou's reply to Larry » Larry Hoover Lou Pilder 9/8/04
Re: Lou's reply to Larry » Lou Pilder Larry Hoover 9/8/04
Re: Lou's reply to Larry-2 » Larry Hoover Lou Pilder 9/8/04
Re: Lou's reply to Larry-2 » Lou Pilder Larry Hoover 9/8/04
Re: Lou's reply to Larry-3 » Larry Hoover Lou Pilder 9/8/04
Re: Lou's reply to Larry-4 » Larry Hoover Lou Pilder 9/8/04
Lou sees a different meaning to Larry's post » Larry Hoover Lou Pilder 9/8/04
Re: requests not to be posted to Dr. Bob 9/8/04

Post a new follow-up

[388297]

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Dr. Bob thread:387548
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040902/msgs/388297.html

	for
in