Posted by Lou Pilder on March 27, 2003, at 19:57:01
In reply to Misrepresentation » Lou Pilder, posted by Jonathan on March 25, 2003, at 0:14:08
Jonathan,
Another reason that I feel hurt by ayuda's post is that there is the statement,[...they {can't see}that the simple answer is to leave the site alone...].
My communication expert said that that part of ayuda's post, which is associated with the people that,[...keep arguing with Dr. Bob about the parameters...],says to me that the statement is insulting to those that accept the opportunity by Dr. Bob to speak on the administration board about [improvements] since Dr. Bob writes that he is,[...open to feedback...]. What is even more outrageous, according to my communications expert, is that ayuda associates those people with being, [troublemakers}, which she did apologise for and I respect her for that. Then ayuda states that these people [can't see] that {there is a simple thing to do, just leave the site alone...]. My expert denotes that statement to be a disrespectfull statement to those that ayuda is referring to, for it states that there is (a simple solution) and [they can't see it.]which is tantamount to saying that there is [only one way] which is to[...just leave the site alone],and the people in question have [emotional problems], which my expert considers to be defamation to those that ayuda is refering to, because they accept Dr. Bob's opportunity for redress of greivences when Dr. Bob writes that he is [open to feedback...].
Then the question of whether the omitted part would substantually or materially affect the meaning if it was included or not included. My expert says,{no}.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:201678
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20030221/msgs/213588.html