Posted by Lou Pilder on February 27, 2003, at 20:46:51
In reply to Re: Lou's request to Dinah, posted by dreamerz on February 27, 2003, at 20:32:01
dreamerz,
You wrote,[...I'm with Lou...need examples...].
I agree with you because without the identification of the alledgedly {humorous} posts, ther is the [potential] for some , and even those that just look and sdo not contribute, to see things differently and, perhaps, gert a wrong impression here about what is humorous and what is not considered by the community. I would not like to be associated with a post that is considered by some to be humorous , if I was to consider that post cruel, demeaning or defaming. With identification of the posts in question, others could voice their point of view. without identification, they are denied to voice their objection, if they have one.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:204442
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20030221/msgs/204503.html