Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

PB Peace Keeper Concept/Ideas..Dr. Bob/ALL

Posted by jay on July 10, 2002, at 6:32:31

OK..I have a 'rough' idea, from many of the posts I have read, about how we could introduce the PB Peacekeeper concept. It is rough, far from 'perfect'..but a start.

Let's say we have a group of 'judges'..but on a rotating basis. Dr. Bob (or the 'judges') find a post that needs 'civil' or such, attention. For starters, either Dr. Bob or one of the other 'judges' could talk with the person about the problem. This would be like a 'warning'..a 'Type 1' penalty.

After a second time it happens, the person is politely asked to not post anything further on the thread, until their 'trial' is over. It may be best to have an odd number of judges..say 3, to break any 'tie's.

The only way a person can continue to post is if they go through this process. Otherwise, the only option would be an automatic temp. ban. Now, what I think would be good would be a way for all parties to communicate. I just don't know how. I don't think it is fair to have it on the PB boards, becaue there may be personal information someone doesn't want to reveal. We may have to open up, or access, say a *private* Yahoogroups, or ezboard, forum.

The three PB 'judges' will hear the persons case, arguments, and reasoning. This will all be kept *confidential*, of course. At the end, the three 'Judges' will discuss the issues, make reccomendations, and either give a warning; or anywhere from a one week to a four week ban. Dr. Bob will have the final say in the decision, but hopefully for the most part, will allow the 'judges' decision to take place.

Now (to make things even more complicated:-), there could also be the choice of bringing the two or more people into the same room, with the 'judges' acting as moderators, hearing out each persons story, and at the end, have a final say in what the outcome could be.

Anyhow..this is VERY rough..and I am sorry it is so complicated...but nothing good comes easy. We want to make this as fair as possible.

I believe 'judges' should be choosen on the skills and ability to be objective, creative, and a firm belief in fairness.

Maybe we can take these ideas and put them into a 'Charter', which is housed on a webpage all can read at anytime.

I personally would be happy to volunteer, under Dr. Bob's direction, the construction of this system. Dr. Bob, I will even email you privately if you wish, so you could ask me further questions. It would be nice to have a few others who are keen on the idea, to contribute, and may be a good idea to put their names forth. Of course, it will all be run under 'democratic' ideals.

Phew....
OK..I am off to bed....

Hope to hear *any* feedback.

Best,
Jay


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:jay thread:6147
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020627/msgs/6147.html