Re: Psycho-Babble

Posted by Dr. Bob on April 2, 2002, at 20:00:12

In reply to Re: Psycho-Babble » IsoM, posted by christophrejmc on April 2, 2002, at 18:04:24

> This would be fine if it was "Psychobabble" -- but not for "Psycho-Babble."
Hmm. Maybe I should've consulted a dictionary first! I guess I meant the former. But I've never liked the way people run words together in domain names...
Bob

Thread

Re: please be civil « christophrejmc Dr. Bob 3/31/02
down to earth streetwise opines « trouble Dr. Bob 3/31/02
Re: blocked for week » trouble Dr. Bob 3/31/02
Re: blocked for week » Dr. Bob christophrejmc 3/31/02
Re: offensiveness Dr. Bob 3/31/02
Psycho-Babble » Dr. Bob christophrejmc 4/1/02
Re: Psycho-Babble » christophrejmc IsoM 4/2/02
Re: Psycho-Babble » IsoM christophrejmc 4/2/02
i'll use my typical, should hold off response... Krazy Kat 4/2/02
Re: Psycho-Babble Dr. Bob 4/2/02
Re: offensiveness Mitchell 4/3/02
Lou's answer to the offensive language lou pilder 4/3/02
Re: offensiveness Dr. Bob 4/4/02
But Lou, dear Zo 4/4/02
Re: But Lou, dear » Zo Lou Pilder 4/4/02
Who gets to keep the money? ;-) (nm) » Lou Pilder Zo 4/4/02
Re: Who gets to keep the money? ;-) » Zo Lou Pilder 4/5/02
The good of the many ... » Dr. Bob Jonathan 4/5/02

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Dr. Bob thread:3678
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020308/msgs/3739.html