Posted by Lou Pilder on February 15, 2016, at 11:13:57
In reply to Lou's warning-crossraods that could lead to death » maximus, posted by Lou Pilder on February 15, 2016, at 10:55:16
> > > > Well, i begin 10 mg a day today.
> > >
> > > Good luck.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Okay. So far no need to move anymore. I feel sleepy. I took a nap. But today i feel anxious. But i'm optimistic.
> >
> > N.B. I've tried Latuda. It was pure hell. I challenged it and re-challenged Latuda with the same result: depression.
> >
> > After 20 years of lithium i have to get off of it due to my kidneys.
> >
> > maximus,
> Are you going to be persuaded to keep taking a drug that has already manifested itself in a movement disorder? Are you going to take Scott's statements that could encourage you to continue taking the drug without really exploring what this drug is and what it could do to you?
> Or are you going to use a keen eye and a cool head and try and find out if Scott's statements could lead you to your death or a life-ruining condition or addiction?
> You see, Scott has used what I call the {crossroads} minimization. He leads you to believe that you could go on with the drug and reach a crossroad that you could either go one way or the other. One way would be to discontinue the drug and the other to keep following the road of being drugged with this chemical nerve agent that could kill you. You could think that you could make the decision without consequences from what Scott has posted to you. But is that really true? Has Scott warned you that the drug could cause addiction? And serotonin syndrome? Or liver disease or diabetes or tardive dyskinesia? Or a host of other life-ruining conditions and suicide? You see, you could be seriously misled to think that not only that you could cross to another drug easily or cross out of drugs completely, which could seriously mislead you to think that the drug is safer than it really is and that you will have a choice. But 1000s of people are killed by these drugs each month. Did they have a choice?
> You see, the drug has a chemical composition that components are used to kill insects. A nerve agent. I am prohibited by Mr. Hsiung to really show you the horrors of how these chemicals have been used in the commission of mass-murder. And do you not think that what you are experiencing is what an insect experiances when the insecticide is put in their system where they die from the drug by the nerves being killed (actuaaly, the nerves are stopped from transmitting the nerve impulse chemically) and their systems stop (just if the nerve to your heart was cut)? And if you continue the Road of drugging with that drug you could reach a cliff and be compelled to fall of into a Lake of Fire.
> Lou
>
> maximus,
I am using my Death-O-Meter now and see that you could be killed by acute renal failure if you continue with this drug. You see, the members here that promote these drugs could be ignorant of the consequences to you when that advocate to continue a drug or such. They simply may not know how these drugs could damage your systems and organs. This is allowed here all against the FDA rules for promoting a drug. Mr. Hsiung could be exempt from those rules but I do not know that.
But so what? Do people have to be killed by these drugs by being misled to think that they are safer than they really are just because Mr. Hsiung could be exempt from the FDA rules? He says that what he is doing will be good for his community as a whole as he thinks and to trust him at that. But do people have to be killed by these drugs so that Mr. Hsiung's community will be good for the whole? Is that not the same argument to justify slavery and infanticide and genocide? I see no justification at all for this community of death to be allowed to get away with advocating drugs without following the FDA rule for such. How many more deaths are going to be allowed here before this is stopped?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1086157
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20160131/msgs/1086179.html