Posted by Lou Pilder on August 10, 2015, at 10:13:59
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-Lou's warning-the blood of the dead, posted by rockerchick46 on August 10, 2015, at 9:20:56
> Lou,
> I don't think this is going anywhere positive or constructive so please do not post to me.
>
> And I am not anti-Semitic - I resent the implication.
>
> TammyFriends,
It is written above that the discussion is determined right now by the poster that the conclusion made by her is that continuing the discussion could not lead to something positive or constructive. How could she know that in advance? Does she know what I could post in any continuation of the discussion, or is there something that she does not want to be revealed?
Then the poster says that it is implied that she is anti-Semitic. To be anti-Semitic means to spread enmity against the Jews, or post what could lead a Jew to feel put down or insult or defame Judaism itself among other well-known understandings of historical anti-Semitism used to persecute the Jews. The overriding issue in this discussion is the indifference to my request to post what criteria she uses to determine is someone is a devil worshiper. This is connected to the use of mind-altering chemicals be it from a psychiatrist or in the historical record those that used drugs to alter the mind or kill that were called the pharmakeia in the Greek, translated into English as "sorcerer".
So there is a critical aspect in the discussion that could be unbeknownst to you that IMHO could save your life if:
The criteria that the poster uses to determine if a person is a devil worshiper is posted here per my request to her to identify those criteria.
Since the poster refuses to post those identifying aspects, and Mr. Hsiung will not require her to do so, there could be a runaway thinking here of all kinds of speculation as to what the poster means by devil worship. Could this arouse antisemitic feelings here by the refusal to post these identifying aspects? It depends on who is reading this. There are people here that Mr. Hsiung calls less-confident people. And by that labeling of people by Mr. Hsiung, there could be other stereotyped people as well according to him. And he makes a rule to accommodate those people so that I have to be limited as to how many consecutive posts that I can post here where others are allowed to post more than 3 consecutive posts with impunity by him. This treats me in a more restrictive manner than the other members here and combined with that I am denied equal protection of the rules by Mr. Hsiung, I am under a tremendous disadvantage here to post my reply here to this poster which could lead a subset of readers to think that this is an anti-Semitic site as my notifications are the only ones that Mr. Hsiung says that he can not act on, which allows anti-Semitism to flourish from here by anti-Semitic statements being allowed by Mr. Hsiung to be seen as being supportive and that he thinks by doing so, it will be good for is community as a whole. Good? Where on this earth is anti-Semitism allowed by the state "good"?.
So I ask you to see that anti-Semitic passages are allowed to be seen here as supportive that could induce into a subset of people the idea that Jews are inferior to Christiandom people and that Judaism itself has been replaced by Christiandom which has its historical implication in the murder of innocent Jewish children. I will show you how anti-Semitism is created an developed here providing the rule of 3 consecutive posts does not apply, for if the poster did post the criteria requested, then your eyes could be opened to The Great Deception that I am prohibited to post here by Mr. Hsiung
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1081096
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150806/msgs/1081238.html