Posted by Lou Pilder on June 8, 2015, at 7:12:56
In reply to Re: 'Low Serotonin, Depression Link a Myth?' » Lamdage22, posted by SLS on June 8, 2015, at 2:35:12
> > What with those that react psychotic to Dopamine and nervous to NE?
> >
> > Exactly, we are f*ck*d!
>
> Don't you think that it is a good thing that drugs with different properties produce different results? I'm sorry if you have had bad experiences with drug treatments. It must seem to you that you are f*ck*d, but this is not true for everyone. One person will react badly to Wellbutrin while another achieves remission with it. Luckily, the first person will respond well to Lexapro. Some people get very well, but only if they take combinations of serotonergic, dopaminergic, and noradrenergic agents. Glutamate is also very important, and is the most common excitatory neurotransmitter. One interesting treatment for bipolar depression is to combine Lamictal (antiglutamatergic) with Abilify.
>
>
> - ScottFriends,
It is written above by Scott what IMHO could influence you to become a life-long psychiatric person that accepts that there is a drug for you, or a combination of drugs for you, that will end your depression.
But what is the evidence for that? And you mothers, are you going to drug your child in collaboration with a psychiatrist/doctor on what Scott has posted here.
Let us use some introspection into what Scott has posted here. He posts that {this is not true for everyone}. That is his response to the poster that posted that these drugs produced a bad experience for him. But what are the statistics that show how many people AND AT WHAT COST a person {receives remission} to a drug as Scott states. These elements are not specified by Scott so we could look at the track-record of these drugs to get a better perspective of the consequences that human beings could be subjected to by becoming a psychiatric patient of a psychiatrist/doctor that drugs their patients.
Now Scott writes, [...Luckily, the first person will respond well to Lexapro...]. But what are the chances that this *Luck* that Scott states is a component of one responding well? The chances are compiled by experts using facts that can give a picture of what these chances are. And chances are, you could kill yourself the moment this drug does to you. You see, there is much more to this than what Scott has posted here and if you are trying to make a more informed decision as to drug yourself or your child on the basis of reading what Scott posts here, I ask you to pause before you jump to any conclusion that what Scott posts here is supportive, for by Mr. Hsiung allowing Scott's statements to stand, you could be led to believe that what he has posted is supportive because support takes precedence here.
You see, there is evidence that great harm could come to those that take these drugs. Harm that could induce a life-ruining condition or death. And if that doesn't get you, the drug could induce addiction and lead one into a road of horrific suffering that many kill themselves in the state of withdrawal as it can be so horrible. Take a chance? Take a chance on what Scott has posted? Be lucky? Or do you want to know all the facts, not just what Scott has posted here.
Friends, I say to you not to be deceived by any statements here that could lead you to think that you could be lucky to escape the consequences of being drugged in collaboration with a psychiatrist without knowing what those chances are for you or your child being drugged. You see, I will show you that the chances are the chances are , mighty slim.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1078602
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150520/msgs/1079531.html