Posted by bleauberry on April 14, 2015, at 12:04:59
In reply to 7 of the Biggest Artists in Medical History, posted by stan_the_man70 on April 9, 2015, at 20:03:12
This article appears to display a high level of anger and bias from its author.
I drew suspicion right away when it impuned cinnamon. I took note of how it was improperly worded "cure"? Sorry, cinnamon doesn't cure diabetes. It does however have literally hundreds of studies showing its wide medical effects, including actions upon blood sugar, which can be a helpful tool for managing diabetes or pre-diabetes.
I so disdain authors that have to be deceptive with wording to make their case. Because that automatically means they didn't have a case to begin with.
Actually, other than the cinnamon thing and huckabee thing, the others look pretty scary indeed. The first two completely innocents were sabotaged by the author for a clearly biased and misinformed bias.
Here is some snake oil from today:
ALL Hospitals....if you get a negative lyme test, you don't have lyme. If they say so, must be, right? Yikes. Snake oil in your own hospital, take your pick.
And, well, never mind. I don't need to get angry too. :-)
IMO
poster:bleauberry
thread:1078107
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150407/msgs/1078261.html