Re: help with interpreting a Pubmed article

Posted by SLS on June 16, 2014, at 7:30:51

In reply to Re: help with interpreting a Pubmed article » poser938, posted by SLS on June 16, 2014, at 7:22:02

> This is an article that reviews an array of clinical studies. It is the conclusion of the review that ultra-brief pulse ECT (both unilateral and bilateral) is less effective than brief pulse ECT.
>
> I would discuss this with your doctors and come to an agreement as to if and when to cross over to brief pulse ECT.
It may be that it is the clinical experience of your doctors that the reduction in cognitive side effects associated with ultra-brief pulse ECT is worth the longer course of treatment that seems to be necessary with this method.

- Scott
Some see things as they are and ask why.
I dream of things that never were and ask why not.
- George Bernard Shaw

Thread

help with interpreting a Pubmed article poser938 6/15/14
Re: help with interpreting a Pubmed article » poser938 Phillipa 6/15/14
Re: help with interpreting a Pubmed article poser938 6/15/14
Re: help with interpreting a Pubmed article » poser938 SLS 6/16/14
Re: help with interpreting a Pubmed article poser938 6/16/14
Re: help with interpreting a Pubmed article SLS 6/16/14
Re: help with interpreting a Pubmed article poser938 6/16/14

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:SLS thread:1066962
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20140609/msgs/1066970.html

	for
in