Posted by SLS on July 5, 2012, at 13:07:29
In reply to Re: Woody Allen's famous joke, posted by ron1953 on July 5, 2012, at 12:44:53
> I don't think LOL counts are indicative of anything other than folks use the acronym way too often. More often than not, the use of LOL is not in reaction to something someone else said - people just seem to attach it to online posts, for meanings (if there is any meaning at all) that may only have significance to themselves. I've seen a gazillion posts with LOL, and I'll be damned if I know why the poster put it there.
See, Ron, you failed to see the humor in my proposal. I was sure it would give you a chuckle. But, alas, it did not. I don't think you ought to be commenting on the sense of humor of the Psycho-Babble community as whole as being absent when you cannot recognize silliness. Some people take themselves too seriously, you know? Of course, there is often truth in jest - or the lack in its recognition.
- ScottSome see things as they are and ask why.
I dream of things that never were and ask why not.- George Bernard Shaw
poster:SLS
thread:1020512
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20120630/msgs/1020873.html