Posted by Lou Pilder on March 24, 2012, at 10:01:29
In reply to Lou's request-dhephahm, posted by Lou Pilder on March 24, 2012, at 9:15:32
> > > Twin leaf is saying what so many of us feel!
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > EE
> >
> > EE,
> > You wrote,[...is saying what so many of us feel...].
> > I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean here. If you could post answers to the following, then I could have the oportunity to respond accordingy.
> > A. Are you wanting to mean that if many {feel} something, that what is felt is true?
> > B. If so, if many in a community {feel} that slavery would be good for the community as a whole, then could slavery be established in that community?
> > C. If many in a community {feel} that the earth is flat, does that mean that those that think that the earth is round can be expelled from the community?
> > D. Being that this community is for support and education, if only one point of view is allowed, could that prevent others from having their lives saved, or prevent a life-ruining condition or addiction if one point of view is not allowed that could save lives and prevent life-ruining conditions or addiction?
> > E. In relation to how these {feelings} are gotten into the minds of members here, could not the allowing of statements here by Mr Hsiung that have the potential IMHO to arouse antisemitic feelings contribute in some way to that members here have those feelings about me as a Jew here? If not, (redacted by respondent).
> > F. If you could look at the posts by me on the administrative board here, could there be an indoctrination goin' on here that could lead some to think that there acould be two standards here?
> > G. If there are two standards here, one allowing statements that could arouse antisemitic feelings and antisemitic feelings toward me as a Jew here, how could that be good for this community as a whole or be supportive?
> > F. (redacted by respondent)
> > Lou
>
> EE,
> You wrote that many here feel what another poster wrote about me as to what I had posted here. Now you are affirming, that as I see it, that {many} [feel] the same.
> Now these feelings could come from what is allowed to stand by Mr. Hsiung, his deputy now, his previous deputies and members past and present, that have posted derogatory and dehumanizing statements toward Jews here, that have posted statements that could arouse antisemitic feelings, have posted statements that could subject me to the potential of being a victim of antisemitic violence, and could support hatred toward Jews that could lead to the murder of Jews and others that reject the claim here that is allowed to stand as being supportive unless Mr. Hsiung posts in the thread otherwise because Mr. Hsiung states that support takes precedence and that he does what in his thinking will be good for this community as a whole and to try to trust him in that.
> Now here is a post from here that I am awaiting a reply from Mr. Hsiung that if he does reply, I think that it could go a long way to preventing Jews from being murdered. I am wondering that if you feel the same about what I have posted here in question, could you look at this post and see if there is the potential for Jews to be accused/put down by what is in the post that is allowed to stand and if the post could arouse antisemitic feelings toward me here that could be transferred into posts here that defame me that are being allowed to stand here?
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20110117/msgs/1002372.htmlEE,
You wrote what you wrote. Here is a post from here and I am requesting that if you are interested in this situation here and want to know more about this ongoing allowing of defamation toward me here, that you read the following. This post allows dehumanizing statements toward Jews to stand, for there was not any sanction to the statements that can be seen now. In fact, there was a rule previously to not post a link to what has antisemitic content. What happened here in this link, there is another prohibition to me by Mr. Hsiung that prohibits me from posting that. But can you understand that by Mr. Hsiung allowing the statements to stand, that there could be {feelings} about Jews that a psychiatrists allows to stand without doing what he says is to prevent a forest fire because one match could start a forest fire as he states here in his thinking? Well, if one match could start a forest fire, could not the one that puts out the matches allow ones to burn that could start a forest fire? You see, there is another prohibition to me here by Mr. Hsiung that prevents me from posting what I could post that could put out the fire, so it burns and could still be burning because the statement could be in another site as typed before the modification. You could email me if you like to learn more about this.
Lou
To see this post:
A. Go to the bottom of this page to the search box
B. Type in:
[admin,428781]
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1013714
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20120316/msgs/1013795.html