Posted by SLS on March 12, 2012, at 19:08:52
In reply to Re: Adding Parnate and prazosin. » SLS, posted by europerep on March 12, 2012, at 11:23:43
> > I'm not usually insulted here. Yet, you do it again.
> Oh, it has happened at least a couple of times during the time I have been here. There was this EricFromNC or something like that guy about a year ago.
I guess he wasn't special.
> But that's not even the point actually.
If that is not the point, then why make it?
> If you consider that me voicing my thoughts on here is insulting then you are free to do so.
Thank you. Phew. For a minute there, I was going to beg you for your permission to be insulted by you.
> After all, this is the internet, and people are free to talk just as they are free to be offended.
I see. So, you really don't care how you impact the feelings and well-being of others?
> > Why are you so compelled to comment on it without my solicitation?
> Opening a thread on an internet board is solicitation to me.
I think you ought to more thoroughly study the definition of the word "solicitation". I did no such thing.
> And I am only continuing to post here in this thread because you react in the way you did.
Silly me. Would you like to have the last word?
As you say, "I am only continuing to post here in this thread because you react in the way you did."
> > If you don't think I'm a liar or an exaggerator, how do you account for my explanations?
> Quite frankly, that is secondary to me.
What, then, is primary to you?
> In the end, it is you who has to answer those questions for yourself.
Asked and answered. Thank you.
> "Europerep is an idiot and has no idea what I'm talking about"
When it comes to me, you wouldn't be the first.
> is a possible answer, but it's far from being the only one.
Name one more, just for the sake of demonstration. I might even let you have the last word.
> > Did you even take this variable into consideration when you opined on my ability to write?
> My comment was rather on your ability to comprehend complex texts of scientific nature.
Yup. I do. I already let out the secret of how I acccomplish this. But to find out, you will have to review the entire thread. :-)
> There's just no way (that I can think of) that a man who hasn't been able to read for his adult life is able to talk neuroscience with Ed and Link or develop "pet theories" about which type of depression could respond to what type of treatment.
Surprise! I can and I do.
So, then, I am a liar and an exaggerator.
There can be no other explanation. I obviously have a subconscious need to be the worst case of depression in the history of the world.
> > Like I said, don't sweat it.
> I don't even know that that means.
It means don't worry yourself about how I might feel about what you have written. Your insults don't affect my self-esteem one iota, but they do anger me. Am I allowed to voice anger in your idyllic Internet world?
> > I don't find your writings to be helpful or of a positive nature.
> Maybe others do? As it turns out, I'm not the only one who thinks what I said in my initial post.
Ah. I see. It is time to determine Scott's degree of depression by majority vote. You can't vote on the Truth, only on the way you choose to navigate it.
You might want to get to know your next target better before you pass judgment and execute your attack. You certainly didn't know me.
- ScottSome see things as they are and ask why.
I dream of things that never were and ask why not.- George Bernard Shaw
poster:SLS
thread:1005781
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20120302/msgs/1012907.html