Posted by SLS on February 24, 2012, at 5:31:02
In reply to Lou's reply- » Solstice, posted by Lou Pilder on February 23, 2012, at 22:55:27
> Solstice,
> You wrote that I was too intellegent to have {misunderstood}.
> I understood what the invitation stated as it could be seen. Only if it can be seen can I know it. I took you at your word, as what you wrote that I could see.
> LouThe poster also requested in the very first post along this thread:
"oh.. please no anti-med posts."
Do you have any trouble interpreting the desires of the poster through these words?
I posted along your thread your concerns regarding Saphris in order to accede to the wishes of the poster whom you are petitioning here.
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20120221/msgs/1011308.html
You are wrong regarding Saphris.
Saphris has no toxic benzene properties and is not metabolized into benzene in the body. No toxic gases are evolved.
Your posts here are off-topic. Implicit in the questions of the above poster is the desire for clinical information about Saphris, not theories that are not founded in chemistry. This is also not a lesson in grammar.
For the sake of the poster here, would you please continue this conversation along another thread?
Thanks.
- ScottSome see things as they are and ask why.
I dream of things that never were and ask why not.- George Bernard Shaw
poster:SLS
thread:1011236
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20120221/msgs/1011346.html