Posted by Conundrum on November 8, 2010, at 10:19:06
In reply to Re: why does one always receive malevolent replies » ggggg123, posted by ggggg123 on November 8, 2010, at 8:31:04
> more an* is the operative phrase in my comment. Therefore implying it is more an ndri at higher doses than it is at lower doses, as this would imply that this verb is relating to the adjective (ndri) in respect to the adjective(higher doses), therefore imperatively implying that venlafaxine is less of an NDRI at lower doses, which unfortunately may not indicate that the serotonin activity is there or remains unchanged.
>
> My comment was poorly written and confusing, as it can be perceived as meaning to different outcomes. It was a friendly piece of advice, maybe somewhat presumptuous, assuming that the discerning receiver of my comment, was aware of Venlafaxine's potent serotonergic activity, I never stated reduced or absent serotonergic involvement.Ok, so you admit it was poorly written and confusing, so there is nothing wrong with making it clearer, for the reader, otherwise it would be a diservice to them. People correct things I say and I don't get bent out of shape. It was Scott, I think, that just corrected me about reboxetine, that it does not have anticholonergic activity. Thats a good thing, since now you won't get the wrong idea about it, and I'm better informed about the drug.
Part of posting on a forum is that someone will criticize your ideas, hopefully in a way that is beneficial. I'm not sure what other forums you've posted on but most people here, don't get off on correcting peoples posts, but if its something obvious like in this post, someone will correct it.
Anyway, I meant nothing personal by it, so come back if you read this. I won't bother you with my ideas.
Complaints: post-SSRI problems: anhedonia, memory and concentration problems, sexual dysfunction. )
Country:USA
Currently taking mirtazapine and tianeptine
poster:Conundrum
thread:968744
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20101107/msgs/969164.html