Posted by floater995 on July 28, 2007, at 12:22:28
In reply to Re: To Nardil or not to Nardil?))Sentience » floater995, posted by Sentience on July 28, 2007, at 4:23:00
New Nardil didn't seem to be less effective for me but may have resulted in somewhat worse side effects (digestive malaise, increased sweating).
I mentioned dietary restrictions as making concealment more difficult. However I did get away with eating quite a lot of the foods on the avoid list. I chose what foods I would break the rules on based on what I read online. But I didn't break all the rules, and unfortunately if I start taking Nardil again I will have forgotten exactly what I got away with.
"The Internet is the best thing to happen for us loonies who formerly had to rely on the crap the drug companies pushed onto us. With their under-reported and trivialised descriptions of side-effects." Yeah, having read about Nardil before starting it, I knew that the worst side effects would pass after a couple months. Also, as I mentioned, a little internet surfing allowed me to find out that the restricted foods list was excessive.
I hope your restarting Nardil takes care of the blankness, and does so with minimal side effects. I really don't know if I will go back on Nardil. At this point my inactivity is a problem and I sort of need a catalyst to get going again.
(I don't know why the carrots in the post title always become closed closed paretheses marks. Oh well.)
poster:floater995
thread:772210
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20070719/msgs/772541.html