Posted by willyee on August 26, 2006, at 16:04:15
In reply to Re: Please Please at least some response.... » willyee, posted by Tomatheus on August 25, 2006, at 21:33:57
Thanks for such a what must have been a time consuming post,i appreciate it.
I have pretty much all the conclusions drawn you have,i have nothing other than the data you mentioned on any formulation change of parnate,which is NOT the post i pasted here,and instead a inactive ingredient that was removed,and should have no bearing on parnate`s effectivness.
After doing a little snooping,i noticed the posters name in other groups,not many,but the few we speak of,and he there mentions the same thing,yet i have seen one other than himself mention this information in anyway,his comments went just unchallenged or for whatever reason more so un noticed so i couldent really make much,but i think unless he provided something somewhere i missed,like you and i,i believe he might have got caught up in the nardil change,with parnate and was partialy right,in one sense there was a change to parnate,but in another sense if the case is so dreadfully wrong as it was a inactive food coloring and there were no big parnate issus around the date it happened unlike nardil where you can almost put the two incidents....."users having trouble"....and its "formula change" hand and hand.So thanks,i think i was wishing on a star on that one.
HOWEVER,with that being said,you mentioned something i find EXTREMLY true,and not prone to any event such as a re formulation,BUT i do think parnate was at a time known on many groups to be a quite activating drug,and i think there is a rasing majority of users finding the same problems with parnate and going off it,we are seeing a great deal,and it is becomming common now,where it was not before,to have extreme daytime fatigue as one of parnates main side effects.
Insomnia was ALWAYS a pretty universal side effect of parnate,and now i believe the fatigue syndrome is falling in place right with that.I know from personal use only a few years ago this was not the case with the drug in action....and i know from tons of reading it was not a big issue in listed side effects when reading on it.
Now almost every user complains of it,so we have now insomnia,for some unbearable fatigue,and were seeing more ineffectivness i believe.
Personaly i see the profile of this drug changing a lot,i know so because as a third party its profile now would not excite me,however when i first heard of it,i could not wait to get a script for it,and when i did,it was immediatly acitvating,and its mood elevating properties were a lot more appeareant it seemd always,even on a benzo.Sorry for the long thread,just something im noticing,truth is,it doesent have to be a formula change,like you said the maois are so underused if a conspirasists really wanted to get reved up,all they would have to do is consider that the company can honestly make whatever process change they want to the drug without presenting it to the public,long as they are confident they are not gonna kill or make someone violently ill,i dont see what would stop them,you see the nardil manf. really have shivered much and they got an entire site on the heels.
poster:willyee
thread:679906
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060825/msgs/680304.html