Posted by ace on June 20, 2006, at 23:08:27
In reply to Re: Taking Nardil to the EXTREME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! » ace, posted by Tomatheus on June 19, 2006, at 18:51:19
Hey friend!
Now, the Nardil take, have always taken, since 5 yrs ago, has not and does not have silica gel inside them. Unless my eyes decieve me grossly.
The Nardil I take has always been the same in terms of the lack of this silica gel issue.
However, I am going to ring both Link and the TGA (equivalant governmental body to FDA in Australia) to see if any incipients have changed over time. However, I don't believe they have. I believe the Nardil which caused bliss 5 yrs ago is the same Nardil as I take now.
My biggest mistake was to cease Nardil when it was providing an UNBELEAVABLE robust remission of my depressive illness, indeed, it was causing a 'healthy' euphoria, and start Clomipramine.
This, I believe began the cycling in and out of healthy euphoria, and subsequent declining in theraputic effect. However Nardil still does provide significant help. But, in contrast to yrs ago, it does not seem to be able to "keep me going" with its euphoria even in the face of negative environmental factors. I believe enzyme induction provides a clue, but I have many theories.....
Just a question, with regards to the oxidation of aqueous hydrazine, are you certain the ammonium ion is one (of many) by products????
And what other byproducts can you ascertain?Thanks so much friend, pls respond!
Ace
poster:ace
thread:658595
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060617/msgs/659533.html