Posted by forgetful mary on March 10, 2006, at 17:04:53
In reply to Re: New Nardil - Ed, read this. » Michael Bell, posted by ed_uk on March 10, 2006, at 14:35:20
It sure as heck WAS coated,...tell me Ed are you a doctor or do you just play one on tv????
Those having problems are probably older people who do not surf the net...get the point ...if you don't --feel for it on the top of your head!!!
> Hi
>
> >There are a lot of people who had no idea about the change in Nardil but experienced a serious return of anxiety and depression right when the drug was reformulated.
>
> How many is a 'lot'? Probably a small proportion of Nardil users. Inevitably, those who are not having problems will not seek information on the internet.
>
> >Absorbancy rate.........are all effected by the type of excipients added to the drug.
>
> In which case, adjusting the dose or frequency of administration would be effective. The 'new' Nardil is claimed to be bioequivalent to the 'old' Nardil, suggesting that if the dose did need to be altered, it would not need to be altered very much.
>
> The 'old' Nardil did not have a complex formulation. It was not enteric coated, it was not controlled release.
>
> Regards
>
> Ed
poster:forgetful mary
thread:614817
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060310/msgs/618497.html