Posted by willyee on March 8, 2006, at 0:09:52
In reply to Re: The 'new' Nardil, posted by forgetful mary on March 7, 2006, at 19:41:18
I agree with mary,scieance can only go so far,ive read tha group a lot,and there are some very intelligent users,more important there are many many VETERAN users,i dont see power of suggestion bringing out a succesful user of the drug for over 20 years to become invovled in a lawsuit action.
Spending a few hours a week reading the post all scieance is put aside for me,its just too many people on it too long to come forward with such intensity,i mean u have veteran users who literaly switched to other drugs,after being on it 20 years,u have users attempting home scieance with no chemistry exper to making "liquid nardil" in hopes of the "same feel"
And in this specific case,unless im mistaken u have two definatly credable voices,but voices that if im not mistaken have never taken the OLD nardil and just using logic,i agree with the logic but the one person who was on it again you can read the most by mary and i presonaly feel the sincerity,i imagine personaly people being told its not changed must kinda feel like when folk tell us "oh just snap ot of it" its like why will u not listen to me,why do u suggest its in my imagination or whatver have u rather than go on a limb and although its hard to make sense of simply believe me when i tell u.
I definatly believe it,the posts from the users are powerful,and its the reason i consider i failed on nardil,i believe i prob would be on it today.Oh and just my view as well lol.
poster:willyee
thread:617166
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060304/msgs/617333.html