Posted by willyee on March 3, 2006, at 20:51:09
In reply to Re: Questions about New Nardil ???? » TylerJ, posted by Chairman_MAO on March 3, 2006, at 15:57:27
I respect your position on Nardil,and im glad youre doing well on it,no one can argue that there are people doing well and i hope no on would want to.
Im also sure the points u raise about how it technicaly can not be much different are probuably true,i say this cause honestly i dont know enough about chemical structure to debate,and assume u do.
However the one comment i will make is this,i know u disclaim a lot of the NEW NARDIL woes,but that website,the one about the reformulation,it isnt just one or two people there,instead there are many VETERAN users who used the med for over 20 years,you also have people like urself who seem very in tune with chemical know how and explain there theory of the difference.
I dont know,with the amount of users over there,assuming its in the hundreds can you really hold doubt that they do not find it effective as they did the older one?
Just as upset you would be if someone applied it DID NOT work for you,id imagine there frustation at people within the company and outside who claim its the same.
I feel its just too many people,on it too long to spark such concern,and i have to believe there was a difference and a significant one.Id also be just as happy to know i personaly was not one of the ones caught in that trap as u seem to be,and be grateful it works.
I just think this is one of those times we dont need to apply scieance,we have x amount of users who have no reason to complain,veteran users literally going off the drug,all in all id say it was simply enough reason to seriously look into re fromulating it,even though i know this is not gonna happen.
poster:willyee
thread:615382
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060227/msgs/615621.html