Posted by craiggetty on November 2, 2005, at 19:59:23
In reply to Re: The other Nardil » ed_uk, posted by Chairman_MAO on November 2, 2005, at 15:47:32
I don't quite get the methadone reference, but it seems apparent that you'll have to wait until a study is done - which is very unlikely. I think it's condescending of you to describe people as conspiracy theorists just because they personally noticed a difference in the 2 nardils. If you didn't want to hear that response then you shouldn't have asked people for their opinions. The "2 different Nardil" theory is similar to people who believe that generic drugs aren't always the same as name brand. Is this true? I don't know, I haven't seen any studies. However, I wouldn't discount a personal opinion that someone has reported. I know people who work for drug manufacturing companies who assert that their companies' products are superior than generic (primarily due to the system of checks and controls). Do I know if this is a fact? No. And neither do you. If you're so antsy, go do your own research instead of whining here. Your negativity isn't helpful.
> I agree. I am waiting someone with anything that looks to me to be a coherent understanding of pharmacy and psychopharmacology free of self-contradicting propositions to argue in favor of the New Nardil conspiracy.
>
> I told this story to my previous psychiatrist, who insightfully told me that sounds like when his methadone patients tell him that it is or sometimes even that they can FEEL it eating away at their bones.
>
> I am open to all evidence; please, convince me! I want to know everything.
poster:craiggetty
thread:574256
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20051031/msgs/574677.html